DOJ-OGR-00020997.jpg
650 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal opinion / court order (excerpt from case 1:20-cr-00330-ajn)
File Size:
650 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal ruling (likely the Maxwell case, 1:20-cr-00330) discussing legal arguments regarding conspiracy counts, overt acts, and the interdependence of crimes. It analyzes whether the abuse of specific victims (Carolyn, Jane, Annie) constituted one common conspiracy or distinct conspiracies involving the Defendant and Epstein. The text references legal precedents and the timing of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act enactment in 2000.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Defendant | Accused |
Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell (based on case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Discussed in relation to conspiracy and intent ...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Co-conspirator |
Mentioned regarding 'Defendant and Epstein’s intent to abuse the victims' and their 'scheme to abuse Carolyn'.
|
| Carolyn | Victim |
Named as a victim of the scheme from 2001 to 2004.
|
| Jane | Victim |
Named as a victim; abuse mentioned in comparison to Carolyn.
|
| Annie | Victim |
Named as a victim; abuse mentioned in comparison to Carolyn.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Refers to the prosecution's case, arguments regarding overt acts, and theory at trial.
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Referenced regarding instructions to district courts and legal precedents.
|
Relationships (4)
Text refers to 'Defendant and Epstein’s intent' and 'Defendant and Epstein’s scheme'.
Key Quotes (3)
"the success of the Defendant and Epstein’s scheme to abuse Carolyn from 2001 to 2004 was not made more or less likely by the prior success or failure to abuse Jane, Annie, or any other underage girl."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020997.jpg
Quote #1
"sexual conduct outside of New York as relevant to Count Three because it tended to establish the existence of a conspiracy and of the Defendant and Epstein’s intent to abuse the victims in New York."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020997.jpg
Quote #2
"That some identical overt acts were not listed for both conspiracies is therefore more a function of legal timing than an indication of two distinct conspiracies."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020997.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document