HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018602.jpg
2.28 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Document exhibit / blog post printout
File Size:
2.28 MB
Summary
This document appears to be a printout of a blog post or essay introduction titled 'In Praise of Monogamy,' originally published in mid-2011. The text discusses the reception of the article, specifically highlighting a supportive comment from polyamory advocate Pepper Mint regarding the pragmatic benefits of monogamy versus the 'hegemonic' view of it. The page is stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018602,' indicating it is part of a larger document production for a congressional investigation.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Clarisse | Author |
Referenced in the text as the author of the original post ('like Clarisse has done here').
|
| Pepper Mint | Commenter / Polyamory Advocate |
Provided positive commentary on the author's post about monogamy.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Feministe |
A website where the original post was cross-posted.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Identified via the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Relationships (1)
Pepper Mint commented on Clarisse's post; Clarisse quotes Pepper Mint favorably.
Key Quotes (4)
"Monogamy is [perceived as] a hegemonic requirement, not an option that should be advocated."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018602.jpg
Quote #1
"I challenge you to find a mainstream article that actually lists out the pragmatic benefits of monogamy, like Clarisse has done here."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018602.jpg
Quote #2
"Discourse that presents monogamy as an actual choice and lists out the pros and cons of that choice is nonmonogamy-affirming in my book..."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018602.jpg
Quote #3
"We have a problem in the poly communities I engage in, where people new to polyamory spend a couple years unfairly trashing monogamy."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018602.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document