DOJ-OGR-00010326.jpg
727 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal opinion (page 3 of 40)
File Size:
727 KB
Summary
This document is page 3 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated April 1, 2022. The text details the Court's findings regarding 'Juror 50,' concluding that the juror's inaccurate answers on a selection questionnaire were due to rushing/distraction rather than deliberate deception. The Court asserts that even if Juror 50 had disclosed his history of sexual abuse accurately, he would not have been struck for cause because he demonstrated the ability to serve fairly and impartially.
People (2)
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Implied by the case header format (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
|
|
| DOJ |
Indicated in the footer stamp (DOJ-OGR).
|
Key Quotes (5)
"skimmed way too fast"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010326.jpg
Quote #1
"Juror 50’s lack of attention and care in responding accurately to every question on the questionnaire is regrettable, but the Court is confident that the failure to disclose was not deliberate."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010326.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court further finds that Juror 50 was not biased and would not have been stricken for cause even if he had answered each question on the questionnaire accurately."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010326.jpg
Quote #3
"survivors of rape have and can serve impartially in trials charging the crime of rape."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010326.jpg
Quote #4
"Thus, this Court would not have struck Juror 50 for cause if he had provided accurate responses to the questionnaire."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010326.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document