EFTA00016720.pdf

155 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal letter / court filing
File Size: 155 KB
Summary

This document is a letter from defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison Nathan dated October 14, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests confirmation that the deadline for filing a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (regarding alleged victims' sexual behavior) is November 15, 2021. The letter argues that recent massive discovery disclosures (over 8,000 pages of 3500 material) and notices regarding Rule 404(b) witnesses received just three days prior require additional time for review, especially given Maxwell's incarceration.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Author of the letter representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Recipient of the letter; Judge for United States District Court Southern District of New York.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the case; currently in custody.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
Law firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
United States District Court Southern District of New York
Court where the case is being heard.

Timeline (3 events)

2021-10-11
Government disclosed its 3500 material (8,000+ pages) and alerted defense to anticipated Rule 404(b) witnesses.
N/A
Government Defense Counsel
2021-10-14
Ms. Maxwell provided a copy of the government's disclosures in the late morning.
Custody
2021-11-15
Proposed deadline for filing motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412.
N/A
Defense Counsel

Locations (2)

Location Context
Address of the United States District Court.
Address of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.

Relationships (1)

Jeffrey Pagliuca Attorney-Client Ghislaine Maxwell
Pagliuca is writing on behalf of Maxwell as her counsel.

Key Quotes (4)

"I write to confirm that November 15, 2021 is the deadline for Ms. Maxwell to file a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412, which governs the admissibility of evidence of an alleged victim's sexual behavior."
Source
EFTA00016720.pdf
Quote #1
"A motion under Rule 412 is not a motion in limine. Rather, it is a motion seeking permission to admit evidence the Rules of Evidence might otherwise exclude."
Source
EFTA00016720.pdf
Quote #2
"Ms. Maxwell should not be required to file her Rule 412 motion any time before November 15, since it was just three days ago (October 11) that the government disclosed its 3500 material, including more than 8,000 pages of testifying witness disclosures."
Source
EFTA00016720.pdf
Quote #3
"Rule 412's procedures apply not just to alleged victims named in the indictment but to any alleged victim in a case involving sexual misconduct, including alleged 404(b) victims."
Source
EFTA00016720.pdf
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document