DOJ-OGR-00017962.jpg

510 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size: 510 KB
Summary

This document is page 89 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding psychological concepts including confabulation, delayed disclosure, secondary gain, and malingering. Ms. Pomerantz repeatedly objects to the questioning, and the Court sustains most objections.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Dr. Rocchio Witness
Undergoing cross-examination regarding psychological concepts of memory and disclosure.
Ms. Pomerantz Attorney (Prosecution)
Raising objections to the defense's line of questioning.
The Court Judge
Ruling on objections (Sustained/Overruled).

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (inferred from Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom (Southern District)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by case number format and 'Southern District Reporters'.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Pomerantz Legal/Adversarial context Dr. Rocchio
Pomerantz objects to questions directed at Rocchio.

Key Quotes (2)

"Confabulation is the brain under certain circumstances filling in gaps to make a whole picture of something, correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017962.jpg
Quote #1
"Malingering is the fabrication of symptoms for financial gain, correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017962.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document