DOJ-OGR-00017626.jpg
522 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
522 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger and the Judge regarding whether to discuss certain topics at a sidebar or to confer with a witness's attorney first. The Judge instructs the counsel to confer with the witness's attorney before bringing the matters to the court.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Likely Government/Prosecution) |
Clarifying topics to be discussed with witness's attorney and the court.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Defense) |
Discussing sidebar topics and conferring with the government.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, directing counsel to confer before approaching sidebar.
|
| Witness's Attorney | Legal Counsel |
Mentioned as a party that needs to be conferred with regarding potential disagreements.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding regarding sidebar discussions and conferring with witness counsel.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by Southern District Reporters footer
|
Relationships (1)
Ms. Menninger states 'I conferred with the government.'
Key Quotes (3)
"My preference would be for you to confer first and then let me know."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017626.jpg
Quote #1
"I think there was one remaining topic that defense counsel preferred to raise as it arises during the course of cross-examination."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017626.jpg
Quote #2
"I conferred with the government. We have prepared,"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017626.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document