DOJ-OGR-00016606.jpg
610 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / testimony
File Size:
610 KB
Summary
This document is page 123 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the stages of memory, specifically describing the 'retention stage' and various 'acts of retrieval' such as discussing an event with others, police questioning, and identifications.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Loftus | Witness / Expert |
Testifying on direct examination regarding memory processes (acquisition, retention, retrieval). Likely Dr. Elizabeth...
|
| Unknown Attorney (Q) | Attorney |
Conducting direct examination of the witness.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR-00016606
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number and reporter firm.
|
Relationships (1)
Loftus is testifying in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) on direct examination, presumably for the defense.
Key Quotes (3)
"So there can be a long retention interval peppered with different acts of retrieval."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016606.jpg
Quote #1
"So after some event, say, you know, a robbery, sometimes people might have a conversation with each other about what they saw..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016606.jpg
Quote #2
"That would be a standard situation in a legally relevant event."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016606.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document