DOJ-OGR-00021018.jpg
628 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court order
File Size:
628 KB
Summary
This document is page 35 of a court order filed on April 29, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text discusses the denial of the Defendant's arguments regarding 'constructive amendment' and 'prejudicial variance' related to Count Three (conspiracy to transport) and Count Four. The Court rules that testimony from a victim named 'Jane' regarding abuse in New Mexico did not improperly amend the charges, noting that evidence also involved victims 'Annie' and 'Carolyn'.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'The Defendant'; filing discusses her conviction and arguments regarding Counts Three and Four.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Testified regarding sexual abuse in New Mexico; central to the argument regarding constructive amendment.
|
| Annie | Victim |
Mentioned as a victim of the conspiracy in evidence presented by the Government.
|
| Carolyn | Victim |
Mentioned as a victim of the conspiracy in evidence presented by the Government.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Implied by case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN; writing the opinion/order.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court |
United States District Court (SDNY), issuing the ruling.
|
|
| Government |
The prosecution (DOJ).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where 'Jane' testified she was sexually abused; subject of the legal argument regarding variance from the in...
|
Relationships (3)
Discussion of Jane's testimony regarding abuse by the Defendant.
Government presented evidence that Annie was a victim of the conspiracy.
Government presented evidence that Carolyn was a victim of the conspiracy.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Defendant’s argument as to constructive amendment of Count Three, conspiracy to transport, wholly depends on her theory as to Count Four."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021018.jpg
Quote #1
"Moreover, it is not substantially likely that the jury convicted the Defendant of Count Three on Jane’s New Mexico testimony alone."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021018.jpg
Quote #2
"Government presented evidence that Annie and Carolyn were also victims of the conspiracy."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021018.jpg
Quote #3
"In the alternative, the Defendant argues that she was substantially prejudiced because the Indictment did not contain any allegations that Jane was sexually abused in New Mexico."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021018.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document