DOJ-OGR-00000423.jpg
636 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (southern district of new york)
File Size:
636 KB
Summary
This document is page 18 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, involving the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The defense attorney is arguing against the government's motion for detention, claiming that double jeopardy applies, that the issue is not trafficking, and that Epstein is not a flight risk given his compliance with law enforcement surveillance in Florida over the previous decade. The attorney suggests traditional bail remedies such as a large cash bond, passport relinquishment, and electronic monitoring.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Defense Attorney (Speaker) | Legal Counsel |
Arguing for bail/release, claiming flight risk is overstated and challenging the government's case.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
referred to as 'he' and 'the defendant'; subject of the bail hearing.
|
| Judge Marra | Judge |
Mentioned regarding previous litigation in the Southern District of Florida.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm listed in footer.
|
|
| Law Enforcement |
Mentioned as having constant knowledge of the defendant's location.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecuting body (DOJ/US Attorney) referred to regarding their presentation and 'seeking two bites at the apple'.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2013
Start of representations made in court regarding challenges to the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement).
Court
Jeffrey Epstein
Legal Counsel
2019-07-16
Court hearing regarding bail/detention (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB).
Southern District of New York
Defense Attorney
Judge
Government Prosecutors
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of previous incarceration and conduct.
|
|
|
Location of Judge Marra's litigation.
|
Relationships (2)
Defense arguing against government's presentation on flight risk and double jeopardy.
Reference to litigation in Judge Marra's court in Florida.
Key Quotes (5)
"we believe we have extremely powerful motions relating to the government seeking two bites at the apple"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000423.jpg
Quote #1
"We also think fundamentally what's at issue here is not trafficking."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000423.jpg
Quote #2
"Law enforcement knows, if they choose to look, exactly where he is at any time."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000423.jpg
Quote #3
"the defendant never sought to flee, never anticipated a time when he would flee"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000423.jpg
Quote #4
"So the risk of flight, I think, is dramatically overstated in the government's presentation."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000423.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document