DOJ-OGR-00010406.jpg
718 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal opinion (page 40 of 45)
File Size:
718 KB
Summary
This document is page 40 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) from April 29, 2022, likely rejecting a motion by Ghislaine Maxwell. The text discusses the defense's failure to prove that missing evidence (financial records, phone records, and pre-9/11 flight manifests) prejudiced the case. The court notes that the defense's claim that these missing records would show an absence of incriminating connections (payments, calls to victims) is purely speculative.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the court ruling (Ghislaine Maxwell, based on case number 1:20-cr-00330), arguing that missing evidence pr...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Associate/Employer |
Mentioned regarding his habits, residences, and potential payments to the Defendant.
|
| Lynn Fontanilla | Witness / Housekeeper |
Described as a live-in housekeeper for Epstein in New York who could have testified about habits.
|
| The Countess | Alleged Author |
Person alleged by the defense to have created the 'household manual' instead of the Defendant.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court |
The entity issuing the opinion and addressing the evidence.
|
|
| The Government |
Elicited testimony at trial regarding flight manifests.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Lynn Fontanilla worked as a live-in housekeeper for Epstein.
|
Relationships (2)
Lynn Fontanilla described as 'a live-in housekeeper for Epstein in New York'
Defense argument that the manual was created by 'the Countess,' not the Defendant
Key Quotes (4)
"household manual was created by 'the Countess,' not the Defendant"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010406.jpg
Quote #1
"None of these identified pieces of alleged evidence satisfies the Defendant’s burden of proving actual and substantial prejudice."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010406.jpg
Quote #2
"flight manifests from before September 11, 2001, were far less detailed than modern manifests."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010406.jpg
Quote #3
"The Defendant’s motion presumes that each piece of missing evidence would have favored her... But this presumption is purely speculative."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010406.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document