DOJ-OGR-00019552.jpg
1.15 MB
Extraction Summary
7
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
6
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / letter to court
File Size:
1.15 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing against a criminal defendant's request to use discovery materials in a civil case. The Government contends there is no precedent for such use and defends the secrecy of grand jury investigations and subpoenas against the defendant's accusations of impropriety. It cites several cases to support maintaining protective orders and separating criminal and civil proceedings.
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Government | ||
| S.D.N.Y. | ||
| D. Conn. | ||
| 5th Cir. | ||
| D. Mass. |
Timeline (3 events)
Grand jury investigation
Civil litigation
Criminal discovery
Relationships (6)
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
Key Quotes (4)
"courts have repeatedly recognized that materials... can be kept from the public if their dissemination might ‘adversely affect law enforcement interests.’"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019552.jpg
Quote #1
"defense counsel cites not a single case to support the argument that a criminal defendant should be permitted to use criminal discovery materials in her civil cases."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019552.jpg
Quote #2
"That is how grand jury subpoenas and investigations frequently work."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019552.jpg
Quote #3
"there is simply nothing nefarious about the Government obtaining materials through grand jury subpoena process"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019552.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document