DOJ-OGR-00009114.jpg
632 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court document (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
File Size:
632 KB
Summary
This document is page 7 of a legal filing (Document 614) from February 24, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It argues that 'Juror 50' provided untrue answers during jury selection (voir dire) by denying past sexual abuse and claiming impartiality, facts which were later contradicted by the juror's own press statements. The text cites the 'McDonough test' to argue that these false answers prevented the defense from challenging the juror for cause.
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
|
| 4th Cir. |
Court cited in legal precedent (Porter v. Zook)
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Court cited in legal precedent (United States v. Greer, United States v. Colombo)
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Legal venue mentioned in case law citation
|
Key Quotes (3)
"In this case, the first prong under McDonough is satisfied by Juror 50’s press statements showing that his purported voir dire answers... were untrue."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009114.jpg
Quote #1
"Juror 50 apparently told the Court in his Questionnaire that he would assess the credibility of alleged sex crime victims 'just the way [he] would any other witness'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009114.jpg
Quote #2
"Question 51 even gave Juror 50 the opportunity to answer these questions confidentially to avoid embarrassment or protect his privacy, but he reportedly declined."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009114.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document