DOJ-OGR-00009293.jpg
1.07 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.07 MB
Summary
This document is a page from an alphabetical index of a court transcript for the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. The page lists keywords from 'otherwise' to 'petit' and provides the page and line numbers where each term appears in the full transcript. The document was produced by Southern District Reporters and is marked with the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00009293.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS | Defendant |
Named in the case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'
|
| Paul |
Listed as an index entry with 4 occurrences in the transcript.
|
|
| Pauley |
Listed as an index entry with 84 occurrences in the transcript.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | Government agency |
Named as the plaintiff in the case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that created the transcript.
|
| Pacer | Government service |
Listed as an index entry with 2 occurrences. Pacer is the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system.
|
| Parkview |
Listed as an index entry with 5 occurrences. The type is unknown from this document.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2012-02-15
Court proceeding for the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., for which this transcript index was created.
Southern District
United States of America
Paul M. Daugerdas
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS', referring to a U.S. federal judicial district.
|
Relationships (1)
The case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,' indicates a legal case where the US is the plaintiff and Daugerdas is a defendant.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document