DOJ-OGR-00009061.jpg
669 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court document
File Size:
669 KB
Summary
This is page 60 of a legal filing (Document 613) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against providing 'Juror No. 50' with advance access to a questionnaire, suggesting it would allow him to manipulate his testimony regarding potential misconduct. The document mentions potential charges against the juror such as perjury or criminal contempt and cites case law regarding 'standing' and the striking of filings.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Subject of Inquiry/Juror |
Juror in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE); the government argues against disclosing a questionnai...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice |
Inferred from Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
|
| United States District Court |
Venue of the filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE)
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address mentioned in a legal citation (United States v. All Right, Title & Int. in Prop...)
|
Key Quotes (4)
"sought to distance himself from his original statements, attempted to destroy evidence, and tried to flee from the media."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009061.jpg
Quote #1
"Any advance disclosure to Juror No. 50 of the questionnaire will undoubtably color Juror No. 50’s testimony and allow him to place himself in the best possible posture."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009061.jpg
Quote #2
"Although there may come a time when Juror No. 50 is entitled to this discovery—if he is charged with perjury, criminal contempt, or some other crime, for example—the time is not now."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009061.jpg
Quote #3
"Juror No. 50’s filings should be stricken or, alternatively, remain under seal."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009061.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document