DOJ-OGR-00021650.jpg
403 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / table of contents (appellate brief)
File Size:
403 KB
Summary
This document is a Table of Contents page (page ii; file page 3 of 93) from a legal filing dated June 29, 2023, in Case 22-1426. It outlines legal arguments defending the District Court's decisions, specifically asserting that the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) only binds the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) and that charges against Ghislaine Maxwell were timely under statutes of limitations (18 U.S.C. § 3283 and § 3299).
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USAO-SDFL |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida; mentioned regarding the binding terms of the NP...
|
|
| District Court |
The lower court whose decisions are being reviewed/defended in this document.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2023-06-29
Document filing date recorded in header.
Court of Appeals (implied by Case number format)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction mentioned in relation to the USAO-SDFL and the NPA.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"The NPA’s Terms Bind Only the USAO-SDFL"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021650.jpg
Quote #1
"The District Court Correctly Concluded that the Charges Were Timely"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021650.jpg
Quote #2
"There Was No Impermissible Retroactivity in Applying Section 3283 to Maxwell"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021650.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document