DOJ-OGR-00010172.jpg
471 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
471 KB
Summary
This is page 15 (filed page 47) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Mr. Shechtman argues against the concept of backdating in tolling agreements and asserts there is no proof the defendant knew specific rules or discussed transactions. He argues that a 'government partisan' on the jury constitutes a serious error rather than a harmless one, citing Justice Marshall's dissent in Strickland.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Shechtman | Defense Attorney |
Speaker arguing regarding proof, harmless error, and prejudice.
|
| Ms. Davis | Government Attorney (Prosecutor) |
Addressed by the Court to respond to Mr. Shechtman.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding official managing the proceedings.
|
| Justice Marshall | Supreme Court Justice (Historical) |
Referenced by Shechtman regarding a dissent in the 'Strickland' case.
|
| Unnamed Male ('He/Him') | Subject of argument/Defendant |
Person regarding whom Shechtman argues there is 'no proof he knew this rule' and that a 'government partisan out to g...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District |
Referenced as the jurisdiction where tolling agreements and specific practices occur (likely SDNY).
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service provider listed in the footer.
|
|
| Government |
The prosecution, referred to regarding the burden of proof.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Judicial district (likely New York).
|
Relationships (2)
THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Shechtman.
Key Quotes (5)
"I'm sitting here with a tolling agreement from the Southern District in a case of mine which says as of January 14. Which is faxed on January 16."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010172.jpg
Quote #1
"There is no proof he knew this rule. There is no proof it was discussed with him."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010172.jpg
Quote #2
"The nature of the error here is that a government partisan out to get him in particular was on the jury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010172.jpg
Quote #3
"The proof, far from overwhelming."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010172.jpg
Quote #4
"Ms. Davis, does the government want to be heard?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010172.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document