DOJ-OGR-00022102.jpg
684 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal order (page 6 of 9)
File Size:
684 KB
Summary
This document is page 6 of a court filing from June 9, 2020, in the case against Thomas (likely regarding Epstein's guards). The Court denies the defendant's request to compel the Government to disclose evidence underlying an Office of Inspector General (OIG) report, accepting the Government's representation that no additional Brady material exists and that the OIG report is not yet drafted. The text cites various legal precedents regarding Rule 16 and Brady obligations.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas | Defendant |
Party seeking discovery materials from the OIG investigation; likely Michael Thomas (correctional officer).
|
| OIG Attorneys | Investigators |
Personnel from the Office of Inspector General investigating the case and writing a report.
|
| Garcia-Pena | Cited Case Defendant |
Referenced in case law citation United States v. Garcia-Pena.
|
| Blondet | Cited Case Defendant |
Referenced in case law citation United States v. Blondet.
|
| Goode | Cited Case Defendant |
Referenced in case law citation United States v. Goode.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| OIG |
Office of Inspector General; conducting an investigation related to the case.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution; responding to defense requests for discovery.
|
|
| The Court |
Judicial body issuing the decision/opinion.
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. |
Southern District of New York; jurisdiction mentioned in citations.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-06-09
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York (mentioned in legal citations)
|
Relationships (2)
Thomas is requesting discovery/materials; Government is opposing or stating compliance.
Government reports on the status of OIG's investigation and report drafting.
Key Quotes (4)
"it is the prosecution’s understanding that [OIG] attorneys have not conducted any additional interviews or otherwise discovered any potential Brady material."Source
DOJ-OGR-00022102.jpg
Quote #1
"Thomas has not identified any specific material that might be in OIG’s possession that has not been disclosed."Source
DOJ-OGR-00022102.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court, therefore, has no basis to compel the Government to disclose additional evidence underlying the Inspector General’s report."Source
DOJ-OGR-00022102.jpg
Quote #3
"attorneys from [OIG] responsible for writing the [r]eport have not yet completed a draft, and do not anticipate completing the [r]eport in the near term"Source
DOJ-OGR-00022102.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document