DOJ-OGR-00016959.jpg
593 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
593 KB
Summary
This document is page 33 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue captures a legal argument between the Judge ('The Court') and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding jury instructions for a charge under 18 U.S.C. § 2421 (Mann Act). The Judge cites *United States v. An Soon Kim*, arguing that the word 'dominant' is not required in the statutory language for proving the purpose of transportation, while Everdell attempts to distinguish the case.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Discussing case law and jury instructions with the Judge. Likely Christian Everdell representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, citing case law found by clerks. Based on case number AJN, this is Judge Alison J. Nathan.
|
| Judge Sand | Jurist (cited) |
Referenced in the cited case law regarding jury instructions language.
|
| An Soon Kim | Defendant (cited case) |
Defendant in the case United States v. An Soon Kim, used as precedent.
|
| Miller | Defendant (cited case) |
Referenced in a parenthetical citation regarding previous jury charges.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals (cited in case law).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding jury instructions in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Southern District of New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on court reporter and case number prefix.
|
Relationships (1)
Direct dialogue in court transcript.
Key Quotes (3)
"Neither 'dominant' nor 'predominant' appear in the statutory language."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016959.jpg
Quote #1
"Judge Sand recommends excluding the word 'dominant' from the charge so as to avoid confusion."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016959.jpg
Quote #2
"we've never required such language to appear in a jury charge on 2421."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016959.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document