DOJ-OGR-00002239(1).jpg
711 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal ruling
File Size:
711 KB
Summary
This document is page 7 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the Court's decision to deny the Defendant's renewed motion for bail, citing the Bail Reform Act and 18 U.S.C. § 3142. The ruling establishes a presumption in favor of detention because the Defendant is charged with offenses involving minor victims, and notes that the Grand Jury indictment provides sufficient probable cause for this presumption.
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Implied by the case header and federal statutes cited.
|
|
| Grand Jury |
Returned the indictment establishing probable cause.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals (cited in case law).
|
|
| 1st Cir. |
First Circuit Court of Appeals (cited in case law).
|
Key Quotes (4)
"The Court accordingly denies Defendant’s request to reopen the original bail hearing and denies her renewed motion for bail."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002239(1).jpg
Quote #1
"The Court is required to presume that no condition or combination of conditions of pretrial release will reasonably assure the Defendant’s appearance."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002239(1).jpg
Quote #2
"if a defendant is charged with committing an offense involving a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 or 2423, 'it shall be presumed that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person...'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002239(1).jpg
Quote #3
"The Defendant’s indictment by a grand jury suffices to establish that there is probable cause to believe that she committed the offenses charged in the indictment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002239(1).jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document