DOJ-OGR-00005853.jpg
707 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court document (government response to motion to suppress)
File Size:
707 KB
Summary
This document is page 70 of a legal filing (Document 397) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on October 29, 2021. The text argues against a motion to suppress evidence, specifically regarding a 'confirmatory identification' made by 'Minor Victim-4.' The prosecution argues the identification is admissible because the victim knew the defendant by name from previous interactions, citing various legal precedents regarding independent reliability of witness identification.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Minor Victim-4 | Witness/Victim |
Provided a confirmatory identification of the defendant; stated she knew the defendant by name from previous interact...
|
| Defendant | Accused |
Subject of the identification procedure; implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number 1:20-cr-00330.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Cited in legal precedence (Wiggins v. Greiner, United States v. Lumpkin).
|
|
| District Court for the Eastern District of New York (E.D.N.Y.) |
Cited in legal precedence (United States v. Crumble).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-10-29
Filing of Document 397 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Court
Relationships (1)
Minor Victim-4 stated that she knew the defendant by name from previous interactions.
Key Quotes (3)
"Minor Victim-4’s identification had clear independent reliability because Minor Victim-4 stated that she knew the defendant by name from previous interactions."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005853.jpg
Quote #1
"The motion to suppress should be denied on this basis, and the identification should be admitted at trial"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005853.jpg
Quote #2
"where there has been no showing of suggestiveness, “any question as to the reliability of the [identification] goes to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005853.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document