DOJ-OGR-00000397.jpg
597 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
597 KB
Summary
This is page 11 of a court transcript filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues to The Court that the discussion should concern the scope of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), not its legality. He references a filing by Northern District of Georgia prosecutors (acting for Southern District of Florida) before Judge Marrah that supported the NPA's constitutionality and asserted Epstein fulfilled his obligations.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB implies Judge Richard M. Berman)
|
| Mr. Weinberg | Defense Attorney |
Arguing on behalf of the defense regarding the NPA scope
|
| District Judge Marrah | Judge |
Judge presiding over the CVRA case mentioned by Weinberg
|
| Mr. Epstein | Defendant |
Subject of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA); described by Weinberg as having performed his obligations
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Northern District of Georgia |
Acting as proxy for the Southern District of Florida
|
|
| Southern District of Florida |
Original jurisdiction involved in the NPA
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-07-16
Court hearing regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB
Courtroom (Southern District of New York implied by case number)
July 2019 (approx. 2 weeks prior)
Northern District of Georgia prosecutors filed submission before Judge Marrah supporting the NPA
CVRA Case venue
Northern District of Georgia prosecutors
Judge Marrah
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
Weinberg argues in defense of Epstein's compliance with the NPA
Text states they 'are proxy for the Southern District of Florida'
Key Quotes (3)
"I think the discussion here is going to be about its scope."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000397.jpg
Quote #1
"Mr. Epstein ever did anything other than fully perform his end as a citizen who is expecting the benefits of a contract that he lived up to."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000397.jpg
Quote #2
"The petitioners are vigorously and have vigorously for many years challenged... claiming that there was no consultation"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000397.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document