DOJ-OGR-00020957.jpg

676 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal court filing / judicial opinion / order
File Size: 676 KB
Summary

This document is page 14 of a court order (Document 653) filed on April 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text analyzes legal standards for investigating juror misconduct, specifically whether a juror lied during voir dire and the limitations imposed by Federal Rule of Evidence 606 regarding inquiring into jury deliberations. It cites various precedents (McCoy, Nix, Tanner) to establish the boundaries of a 'McDonough inquiry' into juror bias.

People (3)

Name Role Context
AJN Judge
Initials in case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (Judge Alison J. Nathan, presiding over US v. Maxwell).
Juror Juror
Unnamed subject of legal analysis regarding bias, nondisclosure, and lying during voir dire.
Defendant Defendant
Referenced in the text as the party against whom the juror might be prejudiced (Ghislaine Maxwell, based on case numb...

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
2d Cir.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals, cited in case law.
W.D.N.Y.
Western District of New York, cited in case law.
U.S. Supreme Court
Implied by U.S. citations (e.g., 483 U.S. 107).
DOJ-OGR
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (indicated in footer bates stamp).

Timeline (3 events)

2022-02-25
Prior Opinion & Order referenced in text
Court Record
2022-04-01
Filing of Document 653 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Court Record
2023-02-28
Date stamped on the appellate record compilation (header)
Appellate Record

Relationships (1)

Juror Legal/Judicial Defendant
Text discusses potential bias or prejudice of the juror against the defendant.

Key Quotes (4)

"The ensuing determination of whether the juror was biased or prejudiced against the defendant may be “affected both by whether the nondisclosure was deliberate and, if it was, by the juror’s motivation to conceal the truth.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020957.jpg
Quote #1
"because it can show ‘a personal interest in this particular case that was so powerful as to cause the juror to commit a serious crime [by lying during voir dire].’"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020957.jpg
Quote #2
"During an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify about any statement made or incident that occurred during the jury’s deliberations"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020957.jpg
Quote #3
"The rule, which embodies “long-accepted Federal law,” is an important safeguard on the integrity of the jury trial system."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020957.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document