DOJ-OGR-00016952.jpg

621 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 621 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding jury instructions defining 'causation,' 'inducement,' and 'persuasion' in relation to a victim referred to as 'Jane' traveling in interstate commerce. The defense seeks specific language linking inducement to the travel, while the prosecution argues that the terms inherently imply causation.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Mr. Rohrbach Prosecutor/Government Attorney
Arguing against specific jury instructions regarding causation and inducement.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion and asking for clarification on the proposed instruction.
Mr. Everdell Defense Attorney
Proposing specific language for jury instructions regarding 'Jane' and interstate travel.
Jane Victim/Subject
Mentioned in the proposed jury instruction as the individual caused to travel.
Broxmeyer Legal Precedent (Case Name)
Referenced by Rohrbach regarding case law (United States v. Broxmeyer).

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
DOJ
Inferred from Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceedings regarding jury instructions in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom (implied)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the reporter's name (Southern District of New York).

Relationships (2)

Mr. Rohrbach Opposing Counsel Mr. Everdell
They are arguing opposite sides of a legal motion regarding jury instructions.
Jane Victim/Accused The Defendant
Context of the trial regarding inducement to travel.

Key Quotes (2)

""This element is satisfied only if the persuasion, inducement, or enticement caused Jane," or we can say "caused the individual," "to travel in interstate commerce as alleged in the indictment.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016952.jpg
Quote #1
"The problem, your Honor, is that to the extent that those words already mean to cause, inducement has a causal meaning, persuasion has a causal meaning."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016952.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document