DOJ-OGR-00021736.jpg
573 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / appellate filing
File Size:
573 KB
Summary
This document is page 76 (PDF page 89) of a legal filing in Case 22-1426 (United States v. Maxwell), dated June 29, 2023. It outlines the Government's argument that Maxwell's sentence was procedurally reasonable ('Point V'). Specifically, it discusses Maxwell's appeal against a 'four-level leadership enhancement' applied to her sentence, noting that Maxwell contests the finding that she acted as an organizer or leader of another criminal participant.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of the sentencing discussion; arguing against a specific sentencing enhancement.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
The court that issued the original sentence.
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Implied by '2d Cir.' citations and case number format.
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Implied by footer 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Unknown (Past)
Relationships (1)
The legal argument centers on whether Maxwell 'led another criminal participant' as required for the sentencing enhancement.
Key Quotes (3)
"Maxwell argues that the District Court erred by applying a four-level leadership enhancement under § 3B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021736.jpg
Quote #1
"That enhancement applies when a defendant was an “organizer or leader of a criminal activity that was . . . otherwise extensive,” which must include the defendant’s leadership of at least one other criminal participant."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021736.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell contests only whether the evidence showed that she led another criminal participant."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021736.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document