DOJ-OGR-00019397.jpg

503 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court document (page 4 of 6)
File Size: 503 KB
Summary

This document is page 4 of a legal filing dated September 23, 2020, related to Case 20-3061. It argues in favor of a motion to consolidate legal proceedings involving Ms. Maxwell and Ms. Giuffre, asserting that consolidation will not cause delay or circumvent Judge Nathan's prior orders. The text emphasizes that the Court has already scheduled oral arguments for both cases on the same day.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant / Appellant
Legal party arguing that unsealing orders affect her ability to litigate the lawfulness of government applications.
Judge Nathan Judge
Judge whose order is being discussed; the text argues the motion is not attempting to circumvent her order.
Ms. Giuffre Plaintiff / Appellee
Legal party opposing the consolidation; her argument regarding delay is dismissed in this document.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Government
Referring to the prosecution/DOJ, specifically regarding applications to modify protective orders.
This Court
The appellate court reviewing the motion to consolidate.
DOJ-OGR
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (indicated by Bates stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

2020-09-23
Submission of legal document argument regarding motion to consolidate.
Court
Future (relative to doc)
Scheduled oral argument in both cases.
Court
The Court Counsel

Relationships (2)

Ms. Maxwell Legal Adversaries Ms. Giuffre
Document argues against Giuffre's claims regarding delay.
Ms. Maxwell Litigant/Judge Judge Nathan
Discussion of Judge Nathan's order in relation to Maxwell's motion.

Key Quotes (3)

"Ms. Maxwell’s point is that, unless the unsealing order is reversed, she might not ever be able to litigate “the lawfulness of the Government’s applications.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019397.jpg
Quote #1
"There is no merit to Ms. Giuffre’s argument that consolidation will cause meaningful delay."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019397.jpg
Quote #2
"This Court should grant the motion to consolidate."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019397.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document