DOJ-OGR-00001667.jpg
1.13 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court filing / letter to judge
File Size:
1.13 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a government filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues against the defendant's broad proposal for a protective order, asserting that it would unfairly expose victims who made minor public statements years ago to intense public scrutiny without their consent. The government contends this is unnecessary for defense preparation and inconsistent with the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | ||
| Jeffrey Epstein | ||
| Ghislaine Maxwell |
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | ||
| Government | ||
| MySpace | ||
Timeline (2 events)
United States v. Epstein
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Relationships (2)
Key Quotes (3)
"The defendant’s proposal is also extraordinarily broad, and without any temporal or subject matter limitation as to the phrase 'public fora.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001667.jpg
Quote #1
"This is plainly unnecessary for any investigative steps or trial preparation, would be grossly inappropriate and unfair, and would be inconsistent with the Crime Victims’ Rights Act."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001667.jpg
Quote #2
"Adopting the defendant’s proposal would mean that any individual who has ever self-identified as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell publicly in any capacity would be subject to public identification by the defendant and her counsel"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001667.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document