DOJ-OGR-00009155.jpg
640 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court document (government memorandum)
File Size:
640 KB
Summary
This is page 36 of a legal filing (Document 615) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The text is a government argument refuting the defense's claim that 'Juror 50' needs to be probed further regarding their ability to assess witness credibility in sexual assault cases. The government argues that Juror 50 already affirmed this ability in their questionnaire (Question 47) and that any further inquiry regarding the juror's personal history of abuse should be limited and conducted privately (sidebar or in camera).
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Subject of a post-trial inquiry regarding questionnaire answers (Question 47 and 48).
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell (based on case number), who is arguing for further inquiry into Juror 50.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Southern District of New York (implied by case number format and context)
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (1)
Defendant claims that had Juror 50 answered Question 48 in the affirmative, the Court... would have 'probed' him
Key Quotes (3)
"This inquiry should be tightly focused."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009155.jpg
Quote #1
"Juror 50 already stated in the juror questionnaire that he could assess the credibility of a witness claiming sexual assault or abuse just like he would any other witness."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009155.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court need not inquire about the details of the victim’s sexual abuse, just as the Court did not probe such details with respect to other jurors who answered Question 48 affirmatively."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009155.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document