HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013141.jpg
2.72 MB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Academic book chapter / scientific paper page (evidence exhibit)
File Size:
2.72 MB
Summary
This document appears to be a page from an academic text or book (Page 225, Section 12.5) discussing 'Clarifying the Ethics of Justice' in the context of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The text argues that AGI ethics cannot be simply hard-coded but must be developed through shared experiences and interactions with humans, citing Eliezer Yudkowsky. The document bears the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013141', indicating it was part of a document production for a Congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community, though Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Eliezer Yudkowsky | AI Theorist / Writer |
Referenced in the text regarding his insistence that 'what we need are not ethicists of science and engineering, but ...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013141' at the bottom of the page.
|
Relationships (1)
Author cites Yudkowsky's views on ethical scientists.
Key Quotes (4)
"what we need are not ethicists of science and engineering, but rather ethical scientists and engineers"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013141.jpg
Quote #1
"We want early-stage AGIs to grow up in a situation where their minds are primarily and ongoingly shaped by shared experiences with humans."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013141.jpg
Quote #2
"Supplying AGIs with abstract ethical principles is not likely to do the trick"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013141.jpg
Quote #3
"AGI intransigence and enmity is not inevitable, but what is inevitable is that a learning system will acquire ideas about both theory and actions from the other intelligent entities in its environment."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013141.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document