DOJ-OGR-00014663.jpg
534 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
534 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Ms. Comey, and Mr. Pagliuca regarding how to respond to a jury question about an item labeled '3505-005'. The parties agree to send a note clarifying that 3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit but referring the jury to 'Carolyn's testimony' regarding it.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor/Attorney |
Discussing jury instructions regarding exhibit 3505-005.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Discussing jury instructions regarding exhibit 3505-005.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion and drafting a note to the jury.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in relation to testimony given regarding exhibit 3505-005 (likely Carolyn typically associated with this ca...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding/sidebar discussion regarding a jury note asking about exhibit 3505-005.
Southern District Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court (likely SDNY)
|
Relationships (2)
Debating the wording of the response to the jury.
Transcript mentions 'testimony regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript you have regarding Carolyn's testimony.'
Key Quotes (3)
"3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014663.jpg
Quote #1
"The testimony regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript you have regarding Carolyn's testimony."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014663.jpg
Quote #2
"I think sending in a note will save time, your Honor, and makes sense."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014663.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document