HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013306.jpg

1.71 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
0
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (opposition to motion for summary judgment)
File Size: 1.71 MB
Summary

This document is page 3 of Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It argues that Epstein dismissed an abuse of process claim against Edwards just before a hearing and asserts that Epstein filed claims without probable cause to hinder legitimate discovery. The text references depositions of Bradley Edwards from 2013 and an order by Judge Crow from 2012.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Bradley Edwards Attorney/Litigant
Opposing Epstein's motion; subject of abuse of process claim; deposed in 2013.
Jeffrey Epstein Litigant
Filed Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissed abuse of process claim against Edwards.
Judge Crow Judge
Referenced in footer regarding a date/order from March 29, 2012.

Timeline (2 events)

2012-03-29
Order or ruling by Judge Crow
Court
Unknown
Dismissal of abuse of process claim
Court

Relationships (1)

Bradley Edwards Adversarial/Legal Jeffrey Epstein
Edwards is opposing Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment; Epstein previously filed an abuse of process claim against Edwards.

Key Quotes (3)

"The record reflects that on the eve of the hearing... the sole remaining abuse of process claim was dismissed by Epstein."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013306.jpg
Quote #1
"Epstein knew that Brad Edwards properly exercised his legitimate judgment regarding the need to pursue proper and effective discovery against him to support the claims which Epstein knew were legitimate."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013306.jpg
Quote #2
"That evidence... further demonstrated that Epstein filed his claims without probable cause and further that there was a bonafide termination in favor of Edwards."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013306.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document