DOJ-OGR-00000086.tif
28.9 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / court opinion
File Size:
28.9 KB
Summary
This document is a legal conclusion affirming the District Court's judgment of conviction for Ms. Maxwell on June 29, 2022. It details five key holdings, including that Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement with USAO-SDFL did not prevent Maxwell's prosecution by USAOSDNY, and that the District Court's sentence for Maxwell was procedurally reasonable. The document emphasizes the gravity of Maxwell's offense and the significant harm she inflicted.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant/Offender |
Her conduct, offense, pivotal role in facilitating the offense, and prosecution.
|
| Epstein | Associated party in a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) |
His NPA with USAO-SDFL did not bar Maxwell's prosecution.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court |
Recognized sentence gravity, explained sentence, did not err in holdings, did not abuse discretion, affirmed judgment...
|
|
| USAO-SDFL |
United States Attorney's Office - Southern District of Florida, involved in Epstein's NPA.
|
|
| USAOSDNY |
United States Attorney's Office - Southern District of New York, involved in Maxwell's prosecution.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-06-29
District Court's judgment of conviction for Ms. Maxwell was affirmed.
District Court
Relationships (1)
Epstein's NPA did not bar Maxwell's prosecution.
Key Quotes (2)
""must reflect the gravity of Ms. Maxwell's conduct, of Ms. Maxwell's offense, the pivotal role she played in facilitating the offense, and the significant and lasting harm it inflicted.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000086.tif
Quote #1
""a very serious, a very significant sentence is necessary to achieve the purposes of punishment""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000086.tif
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document