DOJ-OGR-00018939.jpg
601 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
601 KB
Summary
A transcript page from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Moe argues for the admissibility of a bound, sequentially numbered book under the 'business records exception,' contending that witnesses do not need to testify to recording entries at the exact moment of occurrence. The Court (Judge) agrees to review the relevant case law during a break.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Arguing for the admissibility of evidence under the business records exception.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the argument, stating intention to review case law during a break.
|
| Hesse | Witness |
Name appears in the header 'Hesse - direct', indicating this is during the direct examination or legal argument relat...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by court reporter name and case context.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"the question is whether this is a business record, and based on the testimony from now two witnesses and the organization of the book itself, which shows that this is a sequentially numbered book that's bound"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018939.jpg
Quote #1
"If the requirement were that witnesses come in and talk about the exact moment they recorded something every time, business records would never be admitted in court."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018939.jpg
Quote #2
"I'm going to poke around at the law. If anybody has a case, you may have noticed, I like cases."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018939.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document