DOJ-OGR-00016342.jpg
603 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
603 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records an afternoon session where Ms. Pomerantz (Government) addresses the Court regarding the scheduling of the next witness and raises an objection to Ms. Menninger asking the current witness (A. Farmer, a psychologist testifying as a lay witness) questions about 'hindsight bias,' which Pomerantz argues is the domain of expert testimony.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney (Government) |
Addressing the court regarding scheduling and witness testimony scope.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Defense) |
Responding to scheduling questions; previously asked the government to limit witness testimony.
|
| A. Farmer | Witness |
Currently on cross-examination; identified as a psychologist testifying as a lay witness.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the session.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Government |
Timeline (1 events)
August 10, 2022 (Filed)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case context.
|
Relationships (2)
Pomerantz refers to a request made by Menninger regarding the witness's testimony limits.
Pomerantz is defending the scope of Farmer's testimony.
Key Quotes (2)
"the witness was asked some questions about hindsight bias, which I expect to be a subject of expert testimony"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016342.jpg
Quote #1
"she is testifying as a lay witness and that she shouldn't be asked questions on cross examination that would be the subject of expert testimony."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016342.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document