DOJ-OGR-00021050.jpg
665 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (appeal brief table of contents)
File Size:
665 KB
Summary
This document is a Table of Contents page (page ii) from a legal appeal filed on February 28, 2023. It outlines arguments regarding the Statute of Limitations (Point II) and allegations that Juror No. 50 made false statements during voir dire, denying Ms. Maxwell a fair trial (Point III). The document specifically references the Mann Act, Section 3283, and the McDonough Test regarding juror bias.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of the trial; claims she was deprived of a constitutional right to a fair trial.
|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
Accused of making false statements during Voir Dire and depriving the defendant of an impartial jury.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Congress |
Referenced regarding the intent and authorization of Section 3283.
|
|
| District Court |
Referenced as having erred in applying Section 3283 retroactively.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (1)
Document claims Juror 50's false responses deprived Maxwell of a fair trial.
Key Quotes (4)
"ALL COUNTS ARE BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021050.jpg
Quote #1
"DEFENDANT WAS DENIED HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL JURY BECAUSE A JUROR MADE FALSE STATEMENTS IN VOIR DIRE"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021050.jpg
Quote #2
"Juror No. 50’s False Responses Deprived Ms. Maxwell of her Constitutional Right to a Trial by an Impartial Jury"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021050.jpg
Quote #3
"The District Court erred in applying § 3283 retroactively"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021050.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document