DOJ-OGR-00021064.jpg
631 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / appellate court filing
File Size:
631 KB
Summary
This document is a 'Statement of the Issues Presented for Review' from an appellate brief (Case 22-1426, dated Feb 28, 2023). It outlines four main legal arguments for appeal: the misapplication of a non-prosecution agreement, errors regarding statutes of limitations, juror misconduct involving concealed history of sexual abuse, and a constructive amendment of the indictment regarding venue (New Mexico vs. New York) and state law.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Defendant | Appellant/Defendant |
Subject of the conviction being appealed (contextually Ghislaine Maxwell based on Case 22-1426).
|
| Juror | Juror |
Accused of making materially false statements during jury selection regarding past sexual abuse.
|
| Victims | Victims |
Referenced in relation to the juror's shared experience of abuse.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court |
The court whose decisions are being appealed.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals, referenced in case citation.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where sexual activity occurred related to Count 4.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of the Penal Law cited.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"juror made materially false statements in jury selection that concealed that he had experienced the “exact same thing” as the victims"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021064.jpg
Quote #1
"impose limits on a non-prosecution agreement contrary to the agreement’s plain meaning"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021064.jpg
Quote #2
"constructive amendment and/or a variance from the Indictment"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021064.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document