DOJ-OGR-00009550.jpg

720 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal order
File Size: 720 KB
Summary

This document is page 9 of a court filing (Document 620) from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case, dated February 25, 2022. The text discusses a post-trial motion regarding 'Juror 50,' specifically addressing whether the juror lied during voir dire about social media usage. The Court ruled that a hearing is warranted regarding specific questionnaire answers but denied the Defendant's request to probe the juror's social media history, citing that the juror's minimal Twitter usage and explanation for deleting apps were consistent with their testimony.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Juror
Subject of a hearing regarding potential impropriety and truthfulness during jury selection regarding social media us...
The Defendant Defendant
Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and 'Maxwell Br.'); seeking an inquiry into Juror 50.
McDonough Legal Precedent
Referenced in the context of the 'McDonough' test regarding juror dishonesty.
Baker Legal Precedent
Referenced case law (Baker, 899 F.3d at 130).

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Facebook
Social media platform mentioned by Juror 50.
Instagram
Social media platform mentioned by Juror 50.
Twitter
Social media platform mentioned during questioning and analysis of Juror 50's account.
DOJ
Department of Justice (referenced in footer DOJ-OGR-00009550).
The Court
The judicial body presiding over the case.

Timeline (4 events)

2021-04-01
Juror 50's Twitter account opened (approximate date based on 'April 2021')
Online
2021-11-16
Voir Dire (Jury Selection) testimony
Court
2022-01-01
Juror 50 used Twitter account again after trial (approximate date based on 'January 2022')
Online
2022-02-25
Filing of Document 620
Court

Relationships (1)

Juror 50 Legal Adversary The Defendant
Defendant is challenging Juror 50's impartiality and truthfulness.

Key Quotes (4)

"The potential impropriety that warrants a hearing is not that someone with a history of sexual abuse may have served on the jury."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009550.jpg
Quote #1
"Accordingly, the Court will hold a hearing limited in scope to Juror 50’s answers to Questions 25 and 48 of the questionnaire."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009550.jpg
Quote #2
"Juror 50 stated, 'I do, but I actually just deleted them because I just got out of a relationship and I didn’t want to see anything regarding them. So I am fully off of it right now.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009550.jpg
Quote #3
"Juror 50’s account had only 1 follower and followed only 39 people, which corroborates that his Twitter use was, at most, relatively minimal."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009550.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document