DOJ-OGR-00008343.jpg
592 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
592 KB
Summary
This document is page 33 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated December 10, 2021. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that testimony regarding Accuser 2 and Accuser 3 might lead the jury to convict Maxwell on an improper basis because their allegations do not relate to New York law violations. The Court acknowledges the need to clarify to the jury that while evidence may be relevant to enticement charges, sexual activity in New Mexico cannot be considered as the illegal conduct charged in the indictment itself.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of potential conviction; defense is arguing to prevent conviction on an 'improper basis'.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the case, discussing jury instructions and the relevance of evidence regarding enticement charges.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing on behalf of the defense regarding the scope of testimony and jury instructions.
|
| Accuser 2 | Accuser/Witness |
Mentioned by defense as being added by the government; defense claims they have nothing to do with NY law violations.
|
| Accuser 3 | Accuser/Witness |
Mentioned by defense as being added by the government.
|
| Witness 3 | Witness |
Referenced by the Court for comparison to the current witness's position.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Provider of the official court transcript.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced by defense as the party that chose to add Accuser 2 and Accuser 3.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-12-10
Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion regarding jury instructions related to New York law vs. New Mexico activity.
Southern District of New York (implied by case number and reporter)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction mentioned regarding specific laws and conspiracy charges.
|
|
|
Location of specific sexual activity mentioned by the Court, distinguished from the charged conduct in the indictment.
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Everdell is arguing for the defense to protect Ms. Maxwell from improper conviction.
Defense states the government has chosen to add Accuser 2.
Key Quotes (3)
"unless they're instructed otherwise by the Court, they may convict Ms. Maxwell on an improper basis"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008343.jpg
Quote #1
"the government has chosen to add Accuser 2, Accuser 3, people who have nothing to do with violations of New York law"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008343.jpg
Quote #2
"what they can't take it into account for is itself the New Mexico activity -- sexual activity as itself illegal conduct charged in the indictment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008343.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document