DOJ-OGR-00002252.jpg
710 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal filing (us district court)
File Size:
710 KB
Summary
This document is page 20 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Court denies the Defendant's request for release, reaffirming that she presents a flight risk and determining that her conditions of confinement at the MDC (including COVID-19 lockdowns) do not violate her constitutional rights or justify release. The text notes that the Defendant has received more time than other inmates to review discovery and communicate with counsel.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the detention order; deemed a flight risk (Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell based on Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN)
|
| The Court | Judge/Judiciary |
Issued the order denying release
|
| Defense counsel | Attorneys |
Instructed to confer with Government regarding discovery and meetings
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Opposed the defendant's release
|
|
| MDC |
Metropolitan Detention Center; where the defendant is confined
|
|
| BOP |
Bureau of Prisons; implemented COVID-19 measures
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated in footer stamp)
|
Timeline (2 events)
2020-12-30
Court filing denying release based on flight risk and conditions of confinement
Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Metropolitan Detention Center (prison facility)
|
Relationships (2)
Mentions ability to communicate with her attorneys and review discovery
Government opposes release; Def. Mot. vs Gov't Opp'n
Key Quotes (3)
"the Court again concludes that the Government has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant presents a risk of flight"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002252.jpg
Quote #1
"the Defendant does not meaningfully dispute that she has received “more time than any other inmate at the MDC to review her discovery and as much, if not more, time to communicate with her attorneys.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002252.jpg
Quote #2
"the Defendant provides no authority to conclude that this, standing alone, violates her constitutional right to participate in her defense."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002252.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document