DOJ-OGR-00011648.jpg
598 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
598 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, involving a discussion between the Judge, defense counsel (Pagliuca, Menninger), and the government (Rohrbach). The primary topic is whether potential expert witnesses LaPorte and Naso will testify; the defense suggests it is unlikely and was done out of caution related to a document concerning 'Accuser No. 2,' while the government expresses concern about being surprised mid-trial.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
Addressed by the Court regarding expert opinion notices.
|
| LaPorte | Potential Expert Witness |
Discussed regarding potential testimony and evidence analysis.
|
| Naso | Potential Expert Witness |
Discussed alongside LaPorte regarding potential testimony.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
States it is unlikely experts LaPorte and Naso will testify; mentions Accuser No. 2.
|
| Accuser No. 2 | Victim/Witness |
Referenced in relation to a specific document potentially at issue.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Government Attorney (Prosecutor) |
Expresses concern about late notice if the defense calls experts mid-trial.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, questioning counsel.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Referenced by Mr. Rohrbach regarding the difficulty of mid-trial filings.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding pre-trial motions and expert witness disclosures.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the court reporter name (likely SDNY given case number format and area code).
|
Relationships (3)
Pagliuca discusses endorsing them out of caution.
Pagliuca discusses endorsing them out of caution.
Rohrbach speaks on behalf of the government's interests.
Key Quotes (3)
"The only document that was potentially at issue relates to Accuser No. 2."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011648.jpg
Quote #1
"We endorsed them just out of an abundance of caution, and I don't really see it playing out."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011648.jpg
Quote #2
"The concern is that if the defense decides mid trial that they would like to call these experts, it's going to create a difficult situation for the government"Source
DOJ-OGR-00011648.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document