DOJ-OGR-00021813.jpg
634 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / appellate court document (page 19 of 26)
File Size:
634 KB
Summary
This document is page 19 of a legal filing dated September 17, 2024, related to the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It discusses the District Court's refusal to grant a new trial and specifically addresses a jury note sent during deliberations regarding Count Four and the transportation of a victim named 'Jane' to and from New Mexico. Footnotes address a hearing regarding Juror 50's potential misconduct and citations to the court record.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of the appeal; court denied her motion for a new trial.
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned in a jury note regarding transportation to/from New Mexico.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Subject of a potential juror misconduct hearing mentioned in footnote 34.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court |
The lower court whose decisions are being reviewed.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated in footer DOJ-OGR).
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Cited in case law (United States v. Ianniello).
|
Timeline (3 events)
During jury deliberations
Jury sent a note asking if aiding in the return flight but not the flight to New Mexico constitutes guilt under Count Four.
Courtroom
Jury
District Court
Unspecified (Past)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location mentioned in jury note regarding Jane's flight and alleged sexual activity.
|
Relationships (1)
Jury note questions Maxwell's role in aiding Jane's transportation for sexual activity.
Key Quotes (3)
"Under Count Four (4), if the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane’s return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021813.jpg
Quote #1
"The District Court determined that it would not respond to the note directly because it was difficult to “parse factually and legally”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021813.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell knowingly transported Jane in interstate commerce with the"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021813.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document