DOJ-OGR-00002670.jpg

688 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal brief
File Size: 688 KB
Summary

This page is from a legal filing (Document 144) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 4, 2021. It presents a legal argument regarding the Statute of Limitations (18 U.S.C. § 3283). The text argues that Counts One and Two (under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a)) do not specifically require the victim to be a child or involve physical abuse/kidnapping, and therefore should not be subject to the extended statute of limitations provided by § 3283.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant (implied)
Referenced as 'she' in the context of the charges ('a person could be charged... if she knowingly persuades...'). Thi...
Rashkovski Defendant in cited case law
Cited in United States v. Rashkovski regarding the interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a).

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Source of the document (Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002670).
United States District Court
Implied by the header format (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN).
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Cited in case law (9th Cir. 2002).

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the context of 'Territory or Possession of the United States'.

Key Quotes (3)

"Counts One and Two do not charge offenses involving the sexual or physical abuse or kidnapping of a child and thus are not subject to § 3283."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002670.jpg
Quote #1
"the act that violates § 2422(a) does not necessarily entail the enticement of a child to travel, because the enticement of an individual of any age satisfies the statute."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002670.jpg
Quote #2
"It is immaterial to either offense whether any unlawful sexual activity subsequently occurs."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002670.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document