DOJ-OGR-00016767.jpg
505 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
505 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues to the Judge that the defense should be allowed to highlight that the allegations are 25 years old. He asserts this explains the absence of corroborating evidence, such as geo-location data, because records are destroyed over such a long period.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Speaking to the judge regarding the age of allegations and lack of geo-location evidence.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney |
Mentioned by the first speaker (likely the Judge or Prosecution) who agrees 'a little' with him.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by Mr. Everdell.
|
| The Jury | Jury |
Mentioned by Everdell as the target audience for the argument about the age of allegations.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Refers to the prosecution; the speaker discusses wanting them to testify regarding geo-location info.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell)
Southern District of New York (Implied by reporter name)
Relationships (1)
Everdell is arguing about the government's lack of evidence/geo-location data.
Key Quotes (3)
"I'm not sure why you want the government or if this is a spin to make -- to try to hide what the question is doing"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016767.jpg
Quote #1
"These are allegations that are 25 years old, and when you make a case on allegations that are more than 25 years old, you're not going to have the same type of corroboration available to you because records get destroyed in that amount of time."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016767.jpg
Quote #2
"So the absence of evidence goes to the fact that these are 25-year-old allegations."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016767.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document