DOJ-OGR-00019555.jpg

1.07 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court correspondence (page 2 of 54)
File Size: 1.07 MB
Summary

This is page 2 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 21, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text presents legal arguments supporting the continued sealing of documents related to grand jury proceedings and ex parte applications, citing various legal precedents regarding the First Amendment right of access versus the necessity of grand jury secrecy. A footnote mentions an April 2019 order that allows for limited exceptions to these sealing orders for discovery purposes.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Recipient of the correspondence (Honorable).
The Defendant Defendant
Referenced in footnote 2 regarding discovery rights; in case 1:20-cr-00330 this refers to Ghislaine Maxwell.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Government
Referenced as the party that made ex parte applications.
DOJ-OGR
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (indicated by Bates stamp).
2d Cir.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (referenced in legal citations).

Timeline (1 events)

2019-04-XX
Order issued containing exceptions to sealing orders, allowing provision to subpoena recipients.
Court

Relationships (1)

The Government Legal Adversaries The Defendant
Footnote 2 mentions providing filings to the defendant as discovery in this criminal case.

Key Quotes (3)

"[r]ecords, orders, and subpoenas relating to grand-jury proceedings must be kept under seal to the extent and as long as necessary to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of a matter occurring before a grand jury."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019555.jpg
Quote #1
"Since the 17th century, grand jury proceedings have been closed to the public; and records of such proceedings have been kept from the public eye."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019555.jpg
Quote #2
"The only exceptions to those sealing orders are the permission contained in a certain order issued in April 2019..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019555.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document