HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032321.jpg
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order (order and notice of initial conference)
File Size:
Summary
This is a court order filed on October 4, 2016, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, regarding a civil case (No. 16 CV-7673) filed by a 'Jane Doe' against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein. Judge Ronnie Abrams orders an initial status conference for December 16, 2016, and requires the parties to submit a joint letter by December 9, 2016, outlining the nature of the action, jurisdiction, motions, and discovery status. The document bears a footer indicating it is part of House Oversight committee records.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Proceeding under a pseudonym in lawsuit against Trump and Epstein
|
| Donald J. Trump | Defendant |
Named defendant in the civil suit
|
| Jeffrey E. Epstein | Defendant |
Named defendant in the civil suit
|
| Ronnie Abrams | United States District Judge |
Judge assigned to the case who issued the order
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue where the case is filed
|
|
| House Oversight |
Source of document (indicated by footer stamp)
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location for the scheduled initial status conference
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of the court
|
Relationships (3)
Listed together as Defendants in the case caption.
Case caption listing Jane Doe vs Trump.
Case caption listing Jane Doe vs Epstein.
Key Quotes (3)
"This case has been assigned to me for all purposes."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032321.jpg
Quote #1
"ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial status conference on December 16, 2016"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032321.jpg
Quote #2
"JANE DOE proceeding under a pseudonym, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032321.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document