HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013679.jpg

2.04 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Manuscript / memoir page / essay
File Size: 2.04 MB
Summary

This page appears to be an excerpt from a memoir or philosophical essay (likely by Jeffrey Epstein given the context of House Oversight documents and his known association with scientific funding). The narrator reflects on the tension between intuition and logic, recounting a lecture at IHES by mathematician Dennis Sullivan regarding the Mandelbrot set. The text also discusses non-Euclidean geometry and references personal discussions with mathematician René Thom regarding his work 'Semiophysics' and the nature of reality.

People (3)

Name Role Context
The Narrator ('I') Author/Observer
Self-described 'amateur' mathematician attending a lecture at IHES; discusses personal beliefs on intuition vs logic.
Dennis Sullivan Mathematician
World class dynamical systems theorist and differential geometer-topologist; gave a lecture at IHES observed by the n...
Thom Mathematician/Philosopher
Refers to René Thom; author of 'Semiophysics'; engaged in discussions with the narrator about mental and real world o...

Organizations (1)

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown ('many decades later')
Lecture by Dennis Sullivan at IHES regarding the Mandelbrot set.
IHES
Dennis Sullivan The Narrator

Locations (1)

Location Context

Relationships (2)

The Narrator Observer/Subject Dennis Sullivan
Narrator attended Sullivan's lecture at IHES.
The Narrator Acquaintance/Intellectual Peer Thom
Narrator mentions 'In my discussions with him' referring to Thom.

Key Quotes (3)

"An important Ph.D. dissertation is waiting to be done on the question: is this (pointing to the little object) really there?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013679.jpg
Quote #1
"In the audience of about a hundred professional mathematicians and one amateur, I was the only one that laughed."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013679.jpg
Quote #2
"Objections raised to the Kantian apriority of Euclidean geometry after the discovery of non-Euclidean geometries... appear to me to be irrelevant...they deal with ...the infinitely small and infinitely large...which lies outside the usual cognitive activity of ancient man."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013679.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document