DOJ-OGR-00020811.jpg
733 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal opinion (appellate appendix)
File Size:
733 KB
Summary
This document contains a summary of court rulings denying several motions filed by Ghislaine Maxwell, including motions to dismiss based on double jeopardy, untimeliness, multiplicity, and pre-indictment delay. It also addresses a motion to compel statements from 'Minor-Victim 4' and reiterates that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida does not protect Maxwell from prosecution in the Southern District of New York.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Moving to dismiss various counts and compel evidence; arguments denied by the court.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Co-conspirator |
Mentioned regarding his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its applicability to Maxwell's charges.
|
| Minor-Victim 4 | Victim/Witness |
Maxwell moved to compel production of statements from this individual as Brady material.
|
| AJN (Alison J. Nathan) | Judge |
Referenced in the case citation United States v. Maxwell, No. 20-cr-330 (AJN).
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court |
Southern District of New York (implied by citation); ruling on Maxwell's motions.
|
|
| The Government |
Opposing Maxwell's motions.
|
|
| U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida |
Party to the original NPA with Jeffrey Epstein.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated in footer stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-04-16
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the U.S. Attorney's Office that signed Epstein's NPA.
|
|
|
Southern District of New York, venue of the current trial (United States v. Maxwell).
|
Relationships (2)
Maxwell attempts to use Epstein's NPA to bar charges against herself.
Maxwell seeks statements of Minor-Victim 4 as Brady material.
Key Quotes (3)
"The Court concludes that Maxwell has not previously been put in jeopardy for these offenses and therefore her prosecution on these counts does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020811.jpg
Quote #1
"Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement does not bar the charges in the S2 indictment"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020811.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court understands the primary purpose of Maxwell’s renewed motion to be to preserve these arguments for appellate review"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020811.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document