DOJ-OGR-00001449.jpg

620 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal brief (appellate level)
File Size: 620 KB
Summary

This document is page 9 of a court filing from May 27, 2021, related to Case 21-770 regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the procedural history of Maxwell's failed appeals for bail/pretrial release and the court's affirmation of Judge Nathan's decisions on April 27, 2021. The text specifically highlights Maxwell's complaints regarding her conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically '15-minute light surveillance,' and notes that the appellate court directed such specific relief requests back to the District Court.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Appellant
Subject of bail appeals and confinement conditions motions.
Judge Nathan District Court Judge
Judge whose bail decisions were appealed; recipient of letter regarding sleeping conditions.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center; facility where Maxwell is confined.
District Court
Lower court handling the trial and specific confinement relief requests.
Government
Prosecution; ordered to submit updates on confinement.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2021-04-27
Court affirmed Judge Nathan's bail decisions and denied Maxwell's motion for pretrial release.
Court of Appeals (implied)
2021-04-29
Maxwell submitted a letter to Judge Nathan regarding light surveillance.
District Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
MDC
Detention facility housing Maxwell.

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Judge Judge Nathan
Maxwell appealed Judge Nathan's bail decisions; Maxwell wrote letter to Judge Nathan.

Key Quotes (2)

"relief specific to [Maxwell’s] sleeping conditions... should be addressed to the District Court."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001449.jpg
Quote #1
"address Ms. Maxwell’s sleeping conditions by directing the MDC to cease 15-minute light surveillance of Ms. Maxwell or justify the need for the disruptive"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001449.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document