DOJ-OGR-00014977.jpg
542 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size:
542 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Maxwell). It features the cross-examination of an expert witness, Dr. Rocchio, by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on Dr. Rocchio's definition of a 'child' (age of consent vs. under 18) and references a prior interview with the government on April 9, 2021, documented in '3500 material' (Jencks Act disclosures).
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness / Expert |
Being cross-examined regarding definitions used in previous government interviews.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Conducting cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, ruling on discovery motions, and asking about 3500 material.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Referenced as having interviewed Dr. Rocchio previously.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
Timeline (2 events)
April 9, 2021
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number and court reporters.
|
Relationships (1)
Reference to an interview on April 9, 2021.
Key Quotes (3)
"I would define 'child' as someone under the age of 18."Source
— Dr. Rocchio
(Defining the term 'child' during cross-examination.)
DOJ-OGR-00014977.jpg
Quote #1
"Do you have a 3500?"Source
— The Court
(Judge asking if the defense has the Jencks Act material (witness statements) related to the interview.)
DOJ-OGR-00014977.jpg
Quote #2
"I'm not sure, absent some specific motion for discovery, that I've ever seen expert time records turned over."Source
— The Court
(Denying a request or commenting on the production of expert time records.)
DOJ-OGR-00014977.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document