DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
560 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
560 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated February 28, 2023 (filing date). Attorneys Mr. Everdell (Defense) and Ms. Moe (Prosecution) are arguing over how to answer a jury question regarding 'Count Four' and 'Jane.' The debate centers on whether a 'return flight' from New Mexico can serve as the basis for a conviction if the initial flight's intent for illegal sexual activity is in question.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing that the return flight alone cannot be the basis for a conviction on Count Four because it lacks illegal purp...
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor |
Arguing against a 'no' answer, stating the jury could infer intent to engage in sexual conduct regarding the return f...
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Subject of the transportation/flight to New Mexico and alleged illegal sexual activity.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Accused of aiding in the transportation of Jane.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
The judge presiding over the trial, addressed by counsel.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Destination of the flight in question; location where alleged events may have occurred.
|
Relationships (2)
Discussion of defendant aiding in transportation of Jane for illegal sexual activity.
Everdell arguing on behalf of the defense interpretation.
Key Quotes (5)
"The only evidence we have of a flight to New Mexico with Jane is the one in the flight logs"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
Quote #1
"whether the flight to New Mexico was for the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual activity"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
Quote #2
"could that be the basis alone for a conviction on Count Four"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
Quote #3
"Answer is no, because that return flight is not for the purpose of illegal sexual activity."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
Quote #4
"a jury could infer intent to engage in sexual conduct and the return of a flight in aiding and abetting that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020837.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document