DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
564 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
564 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It records a dialogue between The Court and counsel Ms. Moe regarding the redaction of Exhibit 911, specifically debating whether to redact a painting over a mantel or a small photograph of an individual on a table. Ms. Moe agrees to unredact the painting and instead redact the photograph to protect potential privacy interests or witness identity.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Counsel |
Attorney discussing redaction of exhibits with the Judge.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, instructing on exhibit redactions.
|
| Unidentified Individual | Subject of photograph |
Person depicted in a photo within Exhibit 911 (on a table near a lamp marked D).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| DOJ |
Bates stamp prefix (DOJ-OGR).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court (likely SDNY based on context).
|
Key Quotes (5)
"We'll bring in the jury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
Quote #1
"Counsel, was I right, those other 900 exhibits needed redaction of photos of individuals?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
Quote #2
"We weren't sure whether the issue was the painting over the mantel -- we've redacted that -- or whether there was something else."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
Quote #3
"Does it need to be redacted to protect privacy interests? I don't know -- for example, I don't know if this is a witness."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
Quote #4
"We will unredact the painting and re-mark it to redact that photograph"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document